News

Blog

Michigan Bar Journal: The Distinction of Duty in Breach of Contract

Michigan Bar Journal: The Distinction of Duty in Breach of Contract

Litigation surrounding a breach of contract is rarely as simple as it may superficially seem. While the breach itself can be cause for legal action, it does not take into account the additional torts endured by the plaintiff resulting from it. In this piece for the Michigan Bar Journal, Kotz Sangster lawyer Jovan Dragovic explores how historical Michigan cases have addressed the simultaneous liability of the defendant for both breach of contract and any tangentially-related damages that result from that breached contract.

Read Full Story

Michigan Supreme Court Victory for Kotz Sangster Team

Michigan Supreme Court Victory for Kotz Sangster Team

On June 29, 2020, the Michigan Supreme Court corrected 30 years of jurisprudence that had been wrongfully denying insurance coverage for construction defects. In Skanska USA Building Inc. v M.A.P. Mechanical Contractors, et al. the Court enforced what it properly regarded as plain policy language, and thereby opened the door to coverage. Kotz Sangster is proud to have represented the winning party, Skanska.

Read Full Story

Page 2 of 6 Pages  < 1 2 3 4 >  Last ›